Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347529›Full record

ArticlePediatric investigation2024

Digital interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tianqi Wang, Yu Ma, Xiaonan Du, Chunpei Li, Zhongbi Peng, Yi Wang, Hao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianqi WangDepartment of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Yu MaDepartment of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Xiaonan DuDepartment of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Chunpei LiDepartment of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Zhongbi PengDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation Guizhou Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Guizhou China.
Yi WangDepartment of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation Guizhou Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Guizhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-545X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Digital technology is now widely available for the interventions of autism, but its validity and feasibility remain to be proved. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in improving core symptoms or intelligence quotient in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: Three databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched on November 15, 2022. Randomized clinical trials that enrolled patients with ASD who received DHIs and a control group without DHI treatment were included. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to assess the risk of bias. Results: A total of 33 studies, involving 1285 participants (658 [51.2%] in DHI groups and 627 [48.8%] in control groups), were analyzed to investigate the differences between DHI groups and control groups. Significantly greater improvements in the overall performance of ASD were observed in the DHI groups compared to the control groups (including active, waitlist, treatment-as-usual, and no treatment) with an effect size of 1.89 (Cohen's d 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.52). Studies with treatment-as-usual, waitlist, and no treatment control demonstrated large effect sizes of Cohen's d 3.41 (95% CI: 0.84-5.97), Cohen's d 4.27 (95% CI: 1.95-6.59), and Cohen's d 4.52 (95% CI: 2.98-6.06) respectively. In contrast, studies with active control revealed insignificant effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.73, 95% CI: 0.12-1.33). Interpretation: This meta-analysis found significantly greater improvements in core symptoms or intelligence quotient in ASD patients receiving DHIs compared to those in control conditions. ASD patients may benefit from the DHIs and reduce the economic burden.

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disorderDigital interventionsMeta‐analysisRobotic interventions

Identifiers

PMID39347529
PMCPMC11427904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.