ArticleDigital health
Construction, evaluation, and application of an electronic medical record corpus for cerebral palsy rehabilitation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The electronic medical records (EMRs) corpus for cerebral palsy rehabilitation and its application in downstream tasks, such as named entity recognition (NER), requires further revision and testing to enhance its effectiveness and reliability. Methods: We have devised an annotation principle and have developed an EMRs corpus for cerebral palsy rehabilitation. The introduction of test-retest reliability was employed for the first time to ensure consistency of each annotator. Additionally, we established a baseline NER model using the proposed EMRs corpus. The NER model leveraged Chinese clinical BERT and adversarial training as the embedding layer, and incorporated multi-head attention mechanism and rotary position embedding in the encoder layer. For multi-label decoding, we employed the span matrix of global pointer along with softmax and cross-entropy. Results: The corpus consisted of 1405 EMRs, containing a total of 127,523 entities across six different entity types, with 24,424 unique entities after de-duplication. The inter-annotator agreement of two annotators was 97.57%, the intra-annotator agreement of each annotator exceeded 98%. Our proposed baseline NER model demonstrates impressive performance, achieving a F1-score of 93.59% for flat entities and 90.15% for nested entities in this corpus. Conclusions: We believe that the proposed annotation principle, corpus, and baseline model are highly effective and hold great potential as tools for cerebral palsy rehabilitation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.