ArticleDigital health
Global research on wearable technology applications in healthcare: A data-driven bibliometric analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can consumer wearables support outpatient health monitoring for patients with post-acute infection syndromes? A systematic umbrella review of accuracy, validity, and clinical utility data.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- A Decade of Research at the Intersection of Additive Manufacturing and Wearable Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2025).Biosensors · 2026Review
- A Wearable-Based Program to Optimise Stress Regulation, Resilience, and Wellbeing in Emergency Care Settings: A Proof-of-Concept Study Protocol.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mapping the global landscape of wearable devices in healthcare: A dual-database bibliometric analysis (2016-2026).Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, with the advancement of technological innovation and the widespread application of semiconductor materials, wearable technology has emerged as a significant branch in healthcare, demonstrating considerable potential for further development. This analysis aims to explore the global scientific trends on wearable technology applications in healthcare. Methods: Scientific publications on wearable technology applications in healthcare from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. A total of 19,426 publications were included in the bibliometric analysis. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to conduct bibliometric and visualized analysis. Key metrics such as country, institution, author co-authorships, cited references, journal citations, and keyword co-occurrences were selected for analytical emphasis. Results: The United States of America and China emerged as the top two contributing countries, with significantly higher publication compared to other countries/regions. Conclusions: The number of annual publications on wearable technology applications in healthcare has increased over the past 20 years. This analysis identified the status, trends, hot topics, and frontiers of wearable technology applications in healthcare. These findings will help researchers quickly identify emerging themes and offer new insights into the future development of wearable technology in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.