ArticleChina CDC weekly2024
Development and Diagnosis Performance of IgM-Based Rapid Antigen Test for Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Large Cohort of Suspected COVID-19 Cases - USA, Poland, and Sweden, 2021-2022.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Antigen testing has been crucial in effectively managing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study evaluated the clinical performance of a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS)-based antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) compared to the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: We developed an IgM-based rapid antigen test for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Between July 2021 and January 2022, we analyzed 1,030 NPS samples from participants at three centers in different countries, using both antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) and RT-PCR. Results: The Ag-RDT demonstrated minimal detection limits as low as 0.1 ng/mL for recombinant N antigen and 100 TCID50/mL for heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specificity assessments involving four human coronaviruses and 13 other respiratory viruses showed no cross-reactivity. The Ag-RDT assay (ALLtest) exhibited high sensitivity (93.18%-100%) and specificity (99.67%-100%) across all centers. Factors such as cycle threshold (Ct) values and the timing of symptoms since onset were influential, with sensitivity increasing at lower Ct values (<30) and within the first week of symptoms. Conclusion: The ALLtest Ag-RDT demonstrated high reliability and significant potential for diagnosing suspected COVID-19 cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.