ArticleHeliyon2024
Predicting non-suicidal self-injury among Chinese adolescents: The application of ten algorithms of machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Can machine learning predict non-suicidal self-injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Scars, screens, and stakes: Link between non-suicidal self-injury and problem gambling, problem gaming, and problematic internet use - A systematic review.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing psychological resilience and its influencing factors in the MSM population by machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Employing machine learning for early detection of poly-victimization in rural children: a survey study in China's Chaoshan region.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: High non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) prevalence among adolescents is a global health issue. However, current prediction models for adolescent NSSI rely on a limited set of algorithms, resulting in biased predictions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop multiple machine learning models to enhance prediction accuracy and mitigate biases among Chinese adolescents. Methods: A total of 4487 junior and senior high school students in China were recruited. Multiple algorithms were included, such as logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, Naive Bayes, multi-layer perceptron, K-nearest neighbors, and ensemble learning algorithm like random forest, bagging, AdaBoost, and stacking to build predictive models. Data processing techniques, including standardization and the synthetic minority oversampling technique, were employed to optimize the predictive model. The model was trained on 70 % of the data, reserving 30 % for testing. Results: The ten prediction models achieved a good performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores above 0.700 in the test set. The stacking and random forest models achieved AUC scores of 0.904 and 0.898, respectively. The prediction performance of the Naive Bayes model was relatively poor. The top five important variables were resilience, bully, suicidal ideation, internet addiction, and depression. Conclusions: The ensemble machine learning algorithm showed promising results predicting NSSI among adolescents. Such algorithms should be recommended for future NSSI research to enhance predictive accuracy. Identification of important features in NSSI prediction can help develop screening protocols and lay a foundation for clinical diagnosis and intervention in adolescent populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.