ArticleHeliyon2024
Exploring tumor microenvironment in molecular subtyping and prognostic signatures in ovarian cancer and identification of SH2D1A as a key regulator of ovarian cancer carcinogenesis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Endothelial Venules in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Subtypes and Therapeutic Implications for Immunoradiotherapy.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Molecular and cellular landscapes of the immune microenvironment and multiomic biomarker-sets in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancers.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Diversity within ovarian cancer subtypes and their tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Identification of integrated stress response-related prognostic genes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer using Mendelian randomization, single-cell RNA sequencing, and bulk RNA sequencing.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Fibroblast TGF-β signaling defines spatial tumor ecosystems linked to immune checkpoint blockade resistance.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A deadly gynecological cancer, ovarian cancer (OV), has a poor prognosis because of late-stage diagnosis and few targeted therapies. Addressing the tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors has shown promise since it is crucial in promoting cancer progression. Methods: We obtained bulk RNA-seq data from TCGA-OV, GSE26712, GSE102073, and ICGC cohorts, as well as scRNA-seq data from EMTAB8107, GSE118828, GSE130000, and GSE154600 cohorts using the TISCH2 database. The ConsensusClusterPlus package was used to cluster the OV tumor tissues hierarchically to determine two molecularly different groups (C1 and C2). A total of ten different types of machine learning techniques with 101 combinations were used for prognostic model construction. Using eight TME algorithms integrated into the IOBR R package, the bulk RNA-seq dataset was analyzed. For in vitro experiments, OVCAR3 and SKOV3, two OV cell lines, were used. The migratory potential of the ovarian cancer cells was assessed using Transwell assay, while proliferation was assessed using CCK8 assay. Results: Based on TME-related gene set expression, two distinct molecular subgroups (C1 and C2) were identified through consensus clustering, with C1 showing higher TME activity. Further analysis indicated that C1 had increased cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), M1 macrophages, and CD8 Conclusion: TME-associated genes were efficient in ovarian cancer molecular subtyping. A TME-based prognosis model was constructed for vigorous prognostic stratification efficacy across multiple datasets. Moreover, we identified a pivotal role of SH2D1A in promoting proliferation and migration in ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.