Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347372›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Assessing the Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Patient Educational Materials for Common Psychotic Disorders.

Joshua L Davis, Cameron Gerhold, Jason Roeder, Rachel A Carr, Lawrence Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua L DavisPsychiatry, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, USA.
Cameron GerholdOrthopedic Surgery, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, USA.
Jason RoederPsychology, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Rachel A CarrPediatrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA.
Lawrence MobleyPsychiatry, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In our age of technology, millions of people use the Internet daily for health-related searches and guidance, both patients and caregivers alike. However, health literacy remains notably low among U.S. adults, and this issue is particularly critical for individuals with severe mental illnesses. Poor health literacy is often linked to low socioeconomic status and correlates with adverse patient outcomes and limited healthcare access. With the average reading level of the U.S. adult at the eighth-grade level, guidelines recommend health information be written to match. This study focuses on the readability of top Google search results for common psychotic disorders, emphasizing the need for accessible online health information to support vulnerable populations with severe mental illnesses. Methods The top five most visited websites for eight psychiatric conditions were included in this study. These conditions included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, bipolar 1 disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features, substance-induced psychotic disorder, and psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition. The Flesch-Kincaid (FK) reading ease and grade level score were calculated for each webpage. Additionally, all institutions and organizations that created each webpage were noted. Results The average FK grade level was 9.9 (corresponding to a 10th-grade level), while the overall FK reading ease was 37.3 (corresponding to college-level difficulty) across all disorders analyzed. Websites on MDD with psychotic features had the lowest average FK grade level, 8.6, and best reading ease score. Websites discussing delusional disorder had the highest average FK grade level, 11.2, while those with information on schizophreniform disorder had the lowest average reading ease with a score of 31.7, corresponding to "difficult (college)" level reading. Conclusion Both patient education and compliance can be improved with more accessible and readable patient educational materials. Our study shows significant opportunities for improvement in the readability and comprehensibility of online educational materials for eight of the most common psychotic disorders. Physicians and other healthcare providers should be aware of this barrier, recommending specific websites, literature, and resources for patients and their caregivers. Further efforts should be aimed at creating new and easy-to-comprehend online material for mental health disorders, ensuring the best quality and care for these patients.

Indexed as

flesch-kincaidmental health educationonline patient educationpsychiatry & mental healthpsychotic disordersreadability measuresschizophrenia and other psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID39347372
PMCPMC11438542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.