Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347367›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Comparative Review of Postoperative Analgesic Use After Total Hip Replacement: Opioids Versus Non-opioids.

Gursimran Singh, Nareshkumar Dhaniwala, Vivek H Jadawala, Ankur Salwan, Nitish Batra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gursimran SinghOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Nareshkumar DhaniwalaOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Vivek H JadawalaOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Ankur SalwanOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Nitish BatraMedicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is a common surgical procedure aimed at alleviating pain and improving function in patients with hip joint pathology. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes. This narrative review examines the comparative efficacy, safety, and implications of using opioids versus non-opioid analgesics in managing postoperative pain following THR. Opioids, while effective for severe pain, pose significant risks such as addiction, tolerance, and adverse effects. Non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and regional anesthesia techniques, offer alternatives with potentially fewer side effects. This review synthesizes current evidence from clinical trials, observational studies, and expert guidelines to provide a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of each analgesic approach. The goal is to inform clinical decision-making and optimize pain management strategies for THR patients, balancing efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

acetaminophenanalgesic efficacynon-opioid analgesicsnsaidsopioidspain controlpatient recoverypostoperative pain managementregional anesthesiatotal hip replacement

Identifiers

PMID39347367
PMCPMC11439489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.