Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347349›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Assessing the Correlation Between Anthropometric Measurements and Bone Densitometry As Indicators of Bone Health in Adult Women in the Community.

Rohan Chandanwale, Kshitija Chandanwale, Rutuja Chandanwale, Ajay Chandanwale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rohan ChandanwaleOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Kshitija ChandanwaleSurgery, Maharashtra Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Nashik, IND.
Rutuja ChandanwaleDermatology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Mumbai, IND.
Ajay ChandanwaleOrthopaedics, Directorate of Medical Education and Research, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Osteoporosis is one of the most prevalent bone diseases in humans and is a significant global public health issue since it is a risk factor for age-related fractures. Fracture risk is significantly influenced by bone mineral density (BMD). Recent research has revealed that there are various genetic and environmental variables that are similar between obesity and osteoporosis. The relationship between anthropometric measurements including weight, body surface area, height, and fat mass and BMD has been the subject of several studies. Decreased bone mass and a high risk of fracture have been linked to low BMI. Materials and methods A total of 370 female patients were included in this study. Anthropometric measures, such as weight and height, were taken in accordance with international standards. We measured the T-score, Speed of Sound (SOS) (in metres/s), Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation (BUA), and Stiffness Index (SI) of the participants using a portable quantitative ultrasonic bone densitometer with a gel-coupled system in a temperature-controlled environment (26 ± 1°C) to estimate the BMD. In this study, we analyzed the relationships between anthropometric measurements such as weight, height, BMI, and waist-hip ratio (WHR) and BMD. Results In our study, we found that the population falling under the categories of Underweight and Obese have shown to have reduced BMD. There is an association between normal BMI and normal BMD. BMI can considerably affect one's risk of developing osteoporosis. Therefore, BMI and weight can be used to screen those who are at risk of having osteoporosis and its associated problems. We also observed an association between menopause and BMD measured by Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS). In the study population, post-menopausal women had a 4 times higher risk of osteoporosis than pre-menopausal women (OR = 4.46). Conclusion Calcaneal QUS is potentially helpful as a pre-screening tool for the evaluation of osteoporosis, although it must be based on device-specific cut-offs that have been tested in the populations for which they are intended to be used in a pre-screen or stratification methodology.

Indexed as

anthropometric measurementsbone mineral densitymenopauseosteoporosisquantitative ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39347349
PMCPMC11439113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.