ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Quality of Primary Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Nine-Year Review at a Tertiary Healthcare Center.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the quality of primary transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) procedures performed at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) over nine years, focusing on proper documentation, completeness of tumor resection, quality of histopathology reports, complication rates, and adherence to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients aged 25-75 who underwent primary TURBT at AKUH between 2010 and 2019 was done. Patients with incomplete records, concomitant procedures, or those who underwent emergency TURBT were excluded. Data was collected on patient demographics, clinical presentation, intraoperative details, and histopathology reports. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 27.0.
results300 patients were initially identified, with 265 meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 61.5 years, with 83% being male. Complete tumor resection was achieved in 35% (n=92) of cases, while deep biopsy was taken in 85% (n=226). Detrusor muscle (DM), a marker of resection quality, was noted in 75% (n=200) of histopathology reports. However, documentation quality varied, with 54% (n=143) of cases lacking clear information on resection completeness. The administration of a single instillation of a chemotherapeutic agent (SICA) was recorded in 79% (n=210) of patients, and the 30-day postoperative complication rate was monitored.
conclusionThe study highlights areas for improvement in the quality of TURBT procedures at AKUH, particularly in the documentation of resection completeness and adherence to established guidelines. Ensuring thorough resection and proper documentation is critical to optimizing patient outcomes and future management plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.