ReviewCureus2024
Sodium Bicarbonate In In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) for Blood Gas and Electrolyte Analysis in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests' Management; a Cross-sectional Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Complexities, Benefits, Risks, and Clinical Implications of Sodium Bicarbonate Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest is a common cause of death worldwide. Sodium bicarbonate (SB) has commonly been used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to correct metabolic acidosis (MA). However, the existence of evidence about its administration remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to summarize the effectiveness of SB in patients with in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We searched Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for studies that used SB in cardiac arrest, from November 1962 until December 2023. A total of 372 records were identified and 12 studies were included. Despite few studies suggesting that SB may improve outcomes in prolonged CPR, the overall data revealed that SB was associated with lower rates of ROSC and outcomes. This review conceded that there is limited evidence to warrant the use of SB during CPR other than under specific conditions, which include hyperkalemic cardiac arrest, severe cardiotoxicity, or overdose due to tricyclic antidepressants. In conclusion, SB is not recommended for conventional use in patients with cardiac arrest. Further studies should be performed to determine whether it has any benefit in these scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.