ArticleCureus2024
Patients' Perspectives and Attitudes About the Relationship Between Fixed Orthodontic Treatment and Oral Hygiene.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Awareness and perception of white spot lesions amongst adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: a cross-sectional study of caries preventive adherence.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate patients' attitudes and perspectives on the relationship between fixed orthodontic treatment and oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study included 175 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Data was collected through questionnaires that included patient demographics, oral hygiene behaviours, perspectives on white spot lesions (WSL) and periodontal problems, and attitudes towards orthodontic treatment. The chi-square test was used to analyse the relationship between categorical data. The significance level was set at p<0.05.
resultsThe mean age of the patients (109 males, 66 females) was 17.8±6.4 years. Most of the patients who received orthodontic treatment brushed their teeth twice a day. Traditional and orthodontic toothbrushes were preferred over electric ones. The most common oral hygiene tools were toothbrushes and interdental brushes. A total of 151 patients (86.28%) indicated that their primary source of oral hygiene guidance was the orthodontist. A total of 113 patients (64.57%) had no knowledge of dental plaque, while 117 patients (66.85%) had no knowledge of WSL. While 80 patients (84%) with knowledge about periodontal problems believed that the primary cause of periodontal problems was inadequate oral hygiene, 43 patients (74.85%) with knowledge about WSL attributed the main cause of WSL to the use of braces. Negative attitudes towards orthodontic treatment and oral hygiene were more prevalent among adolescents (p
conclusionThis study highlights the limited patient awareness of plaque and WSL during fixed orthodontic treatment. Physician guidance has a significant impact on patient attitudes, and specific educational programmes are required in orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.