Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347286›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Assessing the Effect of Infant Peanut Exposure Guidelines on Peanut Aspiration Using Google Trends Search Analysis.

Dana N Eitan, Bryant O Noss, Shauna R Schroeder, Patrick Scheffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana N EitanSchool of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Bryant O NossSchool of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Shauna R SchroederDepartment of Gastroenterology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, USA.
Patrick SchefflerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) changed guidelines in 2017 to recommend introducing infants to peanuts as early as four months. Peanuts are also one of the most commonly aspirated food-related foreign bodies. Google Trends search pattern analysis has been validated in epidemiologic research as being reflective of healthcare events. Methodology Google Trends measures the popularity of a search term in a given week compared to the popularity of all search terms in that week, calculated as relative search volume (RSV), yielding a value between 0 and 100. We compiled peanut aspiration-related search data from January 2012 to January 2022 and compared the relative popularity of these searches before the change in guidelines to after. Results All queried search terms significantly increased in RSV when comparing the five years before and following January 2017. When pooling all terms, the median RSV increase was 13.8% (p < 0.001). "Choke on peanut" and the combination of peanut and cough had the highest median RSV increases from 9.6 to 17 and 50.8 to 63.1, respectively. Conclusions The change in 2017 of the AAP guidelines on early childhood peanut exposure was associated with an increase in online searches for peanut aspiration. This may be reflective of increased aspiration events, or possibly increased concern for aspiration. Current results support the need to closely counsel families on infant-safe peanut products to prevent dangerous aspiration events.

Indexed as

allergy prevention in childrenaspiration riskgoogle trendpeanut allergypediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39347286
PMCPMC11438473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.