Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347257›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The WELLMESS Project (Move Well, Eat Well, Sleep Well, Stress Well).

Deeksha R Machireddy, Claudia G Reid, Joshua C Hollingsworth, David Redden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deeksha R MachireddyCollege of Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM-Auburn), Auburn, USA.
Claudia G ReidCollege of Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM-Auburn), Auburn, USA.
Joshua C HollingsworthPharmacology, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM-Auburn), Auburn, USA.
David ReddenResearch and Biostatistics, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM-Auburn), Auburn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Medical education is a rigorous and demanding journey that requires intellectual ability and emotional resilience. Burnout among medical students is a growing concern as it affects individuals' well-being and can have long-term implications on the quality of patient care. Recognizing the protective effects of healthy lifestyle factors such as sleep, physical activity, eating patterns, and screen time, various institutions have implemented wellness programs to promote students' mental and physical well-being. Objectives The main objective of this study was to assess for variations and associations between first- and second-year osteopathic medical students' physical activity, eating patterns, sleep, perceived stress, and phone screen use across 10 different time points throughout the school year. The secondary objective was to assess the impact of month-long health behavior challenges among participants in the five areas studied. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed regarding first- and second-year medical students' physical activity, eating patterns, sleep, perceived stress, and phone screen use, as respectively assessed by the Physical Activity Vital Sign and smartphone step count data; Starting the Conversation diet assessment; Single Item Sleep Quality Scale and a portion of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; Perceived Stress Scale; and smartphone screen time use data. The assessments, built-in Qualtrics (Qualtrics International Inc., Provo, USA), were sent via email and class-wide GroupMe text message at 10-time points, capturing the beginning, middle, and end of curricular blocks and seasonal breaks. Participants could win one of 20 $25 Amazon gift cards each time they completed the assessment. Behavior challenges were implemented at six of the 10-time points and focused on facilitating health behavior change among participants. Results The response rate for the 10 assessments was low, ranging from 7% to 13%. The means (±SD) for each outcome of interest combined across the 10 time points were as follows: physical activity = 112 (±100) minutes/week; step count = 4,627 (±3179) steps/day; water intake = 5.6 (±4.0) cups/day; diet score = 6.3 (±2.1) where 0 = most healthful and 16 = least healthful; perceived stress = 6.6 (±5.8) where 0 = lowest and 40 = highest; sleep = 6.7 (±1.0) hours/night; sleep quality = 6.3 (±1.8) where 0 = terrible and 10 = excellent; and phone screen time = 328.5 (±147) minutes/day. Statistical analysis indicated variation (p<0.05) in physical activity minutes, steps per day, water intake, diet score, and phone screen time minutes over time. Given low participation, only 6 of the 10 behavior challenges were implemented, in which the participation rate ranged from 36% to 65% of assessment participants. Conclusion Results indicate room for improvement regarding lifestyle factors among medical students' physical activity, eating patterns, sleep, perceived stress, and phone screen time use. A primary limitation of this study is the low participation rate. Building on these efforts, students are developing and delivering monthly wellness workshops, including a research component.

Indexed as

health behaviorslifestyle changesmedical educationstress managementwellness

Identifiers

PMID39347257
PMCPMC11439238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.