ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Thermal Stability Between Immersion Bath and Sponge Bath Followed by Kangaroo Mother Care in Stable Preterm in Postnatal Ward.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm neonates are at high risk of hypothermia, which can lead to adverse health outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effects of immersion bath followed by Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) versus sponge bath followed by KMC on the thermal stability of preterm neonates.
methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted on 76 preterm neonates, with 38 neonates in each group (immersion bath and sponge bath). Axillary temperature was measured before the bath and at various time intervals after the bath (immediately, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes).
resultsThe mean axillary temperature was significantly higher in the immersion bath group compared to the sponge bath group immediately after the bath (97.6°F vs. 96.3°F, p<0.001), at 15 minutes (97.6°F vs. 96.8°F, p<0.001), 30 minutes (97.9°F vs. 97.3°F, p=0.001), and 45 minutes (98.1°F vs. 97.7°F, p=0.002) post-bath. However, the difference was not statistically significant at 60 minutes post-bath (98.2°F vs. 98.0°F, p=0.091).
conclusionImmersion bathing followed by KMC is more effective than sponge bathing followed by KMC in maintaining thermal stability in preterm neonates. Healthcare providers should consider adopting this approach as the preferred bathing method for preterm neonates to promote better health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.