ArticleCureus2024
Postoperative Gait Performance Following Pertrochanteric Fractures Is Influenced by the Preoperative Condition of the Gluteal Muscles.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative computed tomography assessment of peri-hip muscles in patients with femoral neck fracture and its impact on postoperative walking function.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Muscle Atrophy Around the Hip Joint in Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture is Associated with Postoperative Walking Ability.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Amid an increasing number of patients with pertrochanteric fractures, early prediction of postoperative gait potential could reduce unnecessary rehabilitation and hospitalization. The relationship between preoperative gluteal muscle condition and postoperative gait outcomes remains unclear. The gluteal muscles are crucial for mobility, and their cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty infiltration are indicators of physical function. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) provides quantitative data on muscle CSA and density, measured in Hounsfield Units (HU). This study aimed to identify which preoperative muscle index, CSA, BMI-adjusted CSA, or muscle density, best predicts postoperative gait ability. We hypothesized that a higher adjusted CSA and muscle density in the gluteus muscles would be associated with superior gait performance. Materials and methods Preoperative assessments included radiographs and CT scans. Patients under 75, with less than four weeks of follow-up, prior contralateral hip surgery, prefracture immobility, male patients, high-energy trauma, or conditions impairing physical performance were excluded. Gait performance was evaluated four weeks postoperatively, classifying patients into two groups: the 'parallel bar group,' requiring parallel bars, and the 'walker group,' walking independently. Patients underwent CM nailing. Preoperative CT scans measured the CSA and muscle density of the gluteus maximus and medius. Measurements were taken from the non-injured side to avoid interference from the fracture. Muscle borders were manually traced, and the CSA and muscle density in HU were calculated. Results Out of 81 patients, 49 met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 87). The patients were divided into the 'parallel bar group' (n=19) and the 'walker group' (n=30) based on postoperative gait performance. No significant differences in age, weight, height, or fracture laterality were observed between groups. The mean (and standard deviation (SD)) of CSA for the gluteus maximus in the 'parallel bar group'/in the 'walker group' was 2211.8 ± 469.8 mm²/2440.0 ± 586.2 mm², respectively (p=0.15), and for the gluteus medius, it was 1751.7 ± 415.2mm²/1869.1 ± 448.3mm², respectively (p=0.36). The mean (and SD) muscle density for the gluteus maximus in the 'parallel bar group'/in the 'walker group' was 13.6 ± 12.7 HU / 20.6 ± 13.0 HU (p=0.07), and for the gluteus medius, it was 25.2 ± 8.4 HU/31.8 ± 10.1 HU, respectively (p=0.02). The ROC curve identified a 30.9 HU cut-off for gluteus medius density, with sensitivity and specificity of 60.7% and 78.9%. The mean (and SD) of BMI-adjusted CSA for the gluteus maximus in the 'parallel bar group'/ in the 'walker group' was 116.4 ± 26.8 m²/10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.