ReviewCureus2024
The Biosimilar Revolution: Assessing the European Union's Approach to Biosimilarity, Interchangeability, Patient Access, and Its Market Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosimilars of anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a narrative review of regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Formulation of Recombinant Therapeutic Proteins: Technological Innovation, Regulations, and Evolution Towards Buffer-Free Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biosimilar revolution alters the biopharmaceutical environment, delivering an appropriate strategy for improving accessibility and cutting healthcare costs. The European Union (EU) has established a broad regulatory structure to ensure the proper and efficient use of biosimilars. This review examines the EU's approach to biosimilarity, interchangeability, and patient access, encompassing the legal framework, scientific considerations, market dynamics, and patient viewpoints. The EU's regulatory system has developed to accommodate biosimilar development, approval, and adoption difficulties. Biosimilarity involves demonstrating comparability to the reference product, whereas interchangeability necessitates a more nuanced approach. Patient access is affected by pricing, reimbursement, and education. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this review combines an evaluation of regulatory documents, scientific literature, and market survey analysis. This review looks at the accomplishments and obstacles of the EU's strategy, identifying areas for advancement and chances for further development. This review intends to give significant insights to stakeholders, such as policymakers, producers, medical professionals, and patients, by examining the EU's biosimilar revolution. This critique helps to shape initiatives to improve the EU's approach, boost patient access, and promote sustainable healthcare systems. Ultimately, this review demonstrates that the EU's approach to biosimilars has successfully increased market growth and suggested suitable areas for development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.