Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347152›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Analysis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Iqbal M Ali, Vijay Sai Reddy M, Varun Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iqbal M AliGeneral Surgery, Dr D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Vijay Sai Reddy MGeneral Surgery, Dr D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Varun ShettyGeneral Surgery, Dr D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the prevalence, acquired risk factors, and treatment outcomes of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) at a tertiary care center in India. Materials and methods Conducted from 2022 to 2024, the study included 100 patients diagnosed with lower extremity DVT. The study subjects included patients visiting the general surgery, vascular surgery, surgical gastroenterology, general medicine, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology departments with symptoms suggestive of DVT. The primary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy as well as to assess the various acquired risk factors for DVT. Patients underwent comprehensive clinical and biochemical evaluations, including venous Doppler ultrasound, and were treated based on their clinical presentations. The study's primary end outcome was early recanalization rates on day 14 post-initiation of treatment and occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Secondary outcome measures included duration of hospital stay, time taken to return to work and early complications. Results The highest incidence of DVT was in individuals in their forties, with a mean age of 44.84+/-11.71 years and a female preponderance of 58% (n=58). Key acquired risk factors identified included hypertension (25%; n=25), diabetes mellitus (20%; n=20), obesity (16%; n=16), and smoking (34%; n=34). Obesity (16%; n=16), a history of DVT (25%; n=25), trauma/immobilization (9%; n=9), pregnancy (10%; n=10), smoking (34%; n=34), and cancer (20%; n=20) were also identified as important acquired risk factors contributing to the occurrence of DVT. Amongst the study participants, 28% (n=28) had femoro-popliteal segment involvement, 36% (n=36) had calf vein thrombosis, and the remaining 36% (n=36) showed femoro-iliac segment thrombosis. Conventional anticoagulation was administered to 69% (n=69) of patients, while 31% (n=31) received thrombolytic therapy. Both treatments showed similar recanalization rates, but thrombolytic therapy was associated with a longer hospital stay (8.61+/-1.65 days; p=0.024; p<0.05) and return to work period (14.65+/-2.31 days; p=0.012; p<0.05). Post-thrombotic syndrome was less common in the thrombolytic therapy group (3%; n=3). Three patients died in the study, with the cause being pulmonary embolism. The descriptive statistics were computed to delineate the study sample. After completion of data collection, data analysis was achieved using SPSS for Windows, Version 16 (Released 2007; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States), and the correlations sought after were achieved using the chi-square test of significance. Conclusion The study underscores the importance of recognizing and managing acquired risk factors for DVT, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and ultimately reducing morbidity and mortality. Understanding these factors and employing effective treatment strategies are crucial for better management and prevention of DVT, enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

anticoagulationdeep vein thrombosis (dvt)dvthypercoagulabilitystasisthrombolytic therapythrombosis

Identifiers

PMID39347152
PMCPMC11430053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.