ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Hemodynamic and Pulmonary Response in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing hemodynamic changes before and after pump in CABG surgery and its factors.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of cardiovascular care, the quest for innovative and holistic approaches to enhance patient outcomes persists. This study analyzes osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and its potential impact on pain intensity, length of hospitalization, respiratory function, and hemodynamic response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OMT, with its emphasis on physical manipulation of the body's muscles and tissues, presents a potential treatment beyond the realms of conventional post-operative care. Google Scholar was used to identify four relevant articles for further review. RevMan 5.4 was utilized for meta-analytic evaluation in order to produce forest plots with associated standardized mean difference (SMD), confidence interval (CI), and heterogeneity (I²). Output from collection and analysis revealed statistically significant decreases in negatively viewed outcomes, including length of stay (SMD 0.39; 95% CI -0.02,-0.76; I² ≤ 0%) and pain control (SMD 1.67; 95% CI -1.34,-0.67; I² ≤ 94%). Parameters for respiratory function and hemodynamic response, including vital capacity (SMD 0.91; 95% CI 0.57,1.24; I² ≤ 96%) and maximal aerobic capacity (SMD 0.50; 95% CI 0.19, 0.82; I² ≤ 0%), showed a statistically significant increase. These findings suggest the incorporation of OMT as a viable adjunct for postoperative management in CABG patients, yielding favorable reductions in adverse outcomes such as length of hospitalization and pain. Moreover, it has demonstrated enhancement in maximal aerobic and vital capacity. This study suggests that the addition of osteopathic management to post-bypass standards can ultimately prevent certain morbidities associated with this specific patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.