ArticleCureus2024
Quality and Educational Value of YouTube Surgical Videos of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educational value assessment of YouTube surgical videos of bladder hydrodistention for surgeons.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Educational quality of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos for advanced endometriosis: institutional archives versus YouTube and MedTube.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
- YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality and educational value of surgical videos on YouTube (Alphabet Inc., Mountain View, CA) demonstrating transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods A thorough YouTube search for "TURP" or "transurethral resection of the prostate" was performed. Each video's uploader, content, duration, date of upload, time since upload, views, comments, likes, and dislikes, and Video Power Index (VPI) scores were recorded and evaluated. Video analysis and rating followed the LAParoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) recommendations, which constitute nine items with values from 0 (absence) to 2 (complete presence). The guidelines' overall score can be 0 to 18. A higher score is indicative of a better level of educational value. Results There were a total of 43 videos included, 10 (23.3%) of which were academic publications. The average LAP-VEGaS score was 6.58, with 22 (51.2%), 18 (41.8%), and three (7%) videos classified as having low, medium, and high educational quality, respectively. None of the videos satisfied all the requirements outlined in the checklist. There was no statistically significant positive correlation observed between the educational score and the number of views. Conclusion A significant proportion of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) videos available on the YouTube platform exhibit limited educational value. Videos frequently lack comprehensive and in-depth descriptions of surgical operations. Those seeking information on TURP should carefully choose which videos to view. It is recommended that academic institutions establish comprehensive criteria aimed at enhancing the educational value of surgical videos on the YouTube platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.