Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347107›Full record

ArticleAsiaIntervention2024

OCT-based comparative evaluation of culprit lesion morphology in very young versus older adult patients with STEMI.

M P Girish, Mohit D Gupta, Akiko Maehara, Mitsuaki Matsumura, Ankit Bansal, Shekhar Kunal, Vishal Batra, Arun Mohanty, Arman Qamar, Gary S Mintz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AsiaIntervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M P GirishDepartment of Cardiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Delhi, India.
Mohit D GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Delhi, India.
Akiko MaeharaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Mitsuaki MatsumuraCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Ankit BansalDepartment of Cardiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Delhi, India.
Shekhar KunalDepartment of Cardiology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, India.
Vishal BatraDepartment of Cardiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Delhi, India.
Arun MohantyDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Arman QamarSection of Interventional Cardiology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
Gary S MintzCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Ziad A AliCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Jamal YusufDepartment of Cardiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of coronary artery disease in very young adults are poorly described. Aims: Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we compared culprit lesion morphology in very young adult patients (≤35 years) versus older adult patients (>60 years) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Culprit lesion morphology was classified as plaque rupture, plaque erosion, or calcified nodule. Thrombus age was subclassified into acute (intraluminal thrombus with surface irregularity) or subacute (mostly mural thrombus with a smooth surface). Results: A total of 61 patients who underwent thrombolysis within 24 hours from symptom onset were included, with 38 (59.7%) subjects ≤35 years and 23 (40.3%) subjects >60 years of age. As an underlying mechanism of STEMI thrombosis, plaque erosion was more common in very young patients (52.6% vs 21.7%; p=0.02) while plaque rupture was more common in elderly patients (65.2% vs 36.8%; p=0.03). Acute or subacute thrombus was identified in 68.9% (42/61) of patients, with red thrombus being more frequent in very young patients. In the entire patient cohort, acute thrombus was more frequent in plaque rupture compared with plaque erosion (62.0% vs 28.0%; p=0.01), whereas subacute thrombus was more common in plaque erosion versus plaque rupture (52.0% vs 10.3%; p=0.0008). Conclusions: OCT showed that plaque erosion and plaque rupture were the most common underlying STEMI mechanisms in very young patients and older patients, respectively, and that subjects with plaque erosion had greater evidence of subacute thrombus.

Identifiers

PMID39347107
PMCPMC11413641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.