Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347096›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024

Aggregation and adhesion ability of various probiotic strains and

Panita Chantanawilas, Nuntiya Pahumunto, Rawee Teanpaisan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. microLife · 2026
    Article
  16. Microbial Biofilms: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Panita ChantanawilasDepartment of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Nuntiya PahumuntoDepartment of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Rawee TeanpaisanDepartment of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: The ability of probiotics to inhibit Materials and methods: Eight probiotic strains and five reference Results: The results showed that most probiotics exhibited high adhesion to H357 cells, specifically oral probiotic Conclusion: This study demonstrated that oral probiotic strains may be useful probiotics for preventing and treating oral candidiasis due to their high ability of aggregation, adhesion, and anti-

Indexed as

AdhesionAggregationCandidaPostbioticsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39347096
PMCPMC11437301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.