ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Incremental net benefit of extending human papillomavirus vaccine to boys in oropharyngeal cancer burden: Meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape Analysis of Literature Using Quantitative Approaches to Synthesize Economic Evaluation Studies: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Redefining oropharyngeal cancer in the HPV era: integrating precision medicine and immunotherapeutic frontiers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is increasing worldwide. HPV vaccines have shown efficacy in preventing diseases in both males and females. Therefore, there is a need to develop cost-effective strategies for HPV vaccines to prevent HPV-related OPC. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness using the global mean of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared to the willingness-to-pay threshold and incremental net benefits (INBs) of HPV vaccination strategies between boys' extension vaccine and girls only. These recommendations will be useful for countries that have not implemented universal HPV vaccines in national programs, such as Taiwan. Materials and methods: Studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination strategies in the prevention of OPC that included both sexes versus girls only were identified through the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases on February 05, 2024, and a meta-analysis of pooled INBs was performed using a random-effects model. The outcome was an effective measurement of the OPC burden. The results are represented in USD (2024). Results: Fifteen model analyses were included. All the studies were conducted in high-income countries. The global mean of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $39,553 (95% CI, $27,008-66,641) per quality-adjusted life years gained, which was below the global mean of the willingness-to-pay threshold of $65,473 (95% CI, $52,138-83,755). Pooled INBs of $9370 (95% CI, $5046-13,695; Conclusion: HPV vaccination strategies that include boys are cost-effective compared to those with girls only in preventing OPC burden. By implementing a universal HPV vaccination program, countries can receive $9370 in additional monetary benefits per patient. Given its relevance to high-income countries, this study offers key insights that can aid policymakers in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.