ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Comparison of the accuracy of dynamic navigation and the free hand approaches in the placement of pterygoid implants in the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Surgery for Pterygoid Implant Placement in Fully and Partially Edentulous Maxillae: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prosthetic-Guided Pterygoid Anchorage for HUG® Subperiosteal Implants: A Technical Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- A Segmentation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Planning Workflow for Static-Guided Pterygoid Implant Placement: A Proof-of-Concept Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimal fiducial marker distribution for navigated tilted implants in edentulous maxillae: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characteristics and impacts of dental implant displacement into the maxillary sinus.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Pterygoid implant is a promising solution for patients with a partially or fully edentulous atrophic maxilla. However, whether dynamic navigation system will improve the accuracy of pterygoid implant surgery is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation and free-hand approaches in pterygoid implant placement in completely edentulous maxilla models. Materials and methods: Twenty three-dimensional (3D)-printed edentulous maxilla models were assigned to two groups: the dynamic navigation system group and the free-hand group. Two pterygoid implants were planned in the bilateral pterygomaxillary area and then placed in each model. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the pterygoid implants were measured after pre- and post-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image fusion. Student's t test and Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 40 pterygoid implants were placed in 20 models. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation group and the free-hand group showed a mean (±SD) entry deviation of 0.93 ± 0.46 mm vs. 2.28 ± 1.08 mm ( Conclusion: The dynamic navigation system has higher accuracy for pterygoid implant placement in a complete edentulous maxilla than the free-hand approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.