ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Comparison of light microscopy and digital microscopy for learning oral pathology practicals among second year dental students.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting Residual Root Canal Filling Material After Retreatment: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Microscopy Compared with Microcomputed Tomography.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- The Impact of Traditional and Virtual Microscopy on Students' Learning of Histology: A Comparative Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Previous studies have shown that digital microscopy is an indispensable tool for teaching oral pathology laboratory course. Despite this, our institute relies solely on recommended/reference book images for oral pathology practicals, neglecting both light and digital microscopy methods. Gathering students' feedback on these methods is essential before considering digital microscopy as part of the oral pathology curriculum. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the usefulness of light and digital microscopy among second-year dental students. Materials and methods: The study was conducted from December 6 to December 7, 2023, in the Department of Oral Pathology, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences. The study involved the selection of five cases from the oral pathology course, followed by feedback on students' diagnostic skills, learning impact and acceptance rate of light and digital microscopy using an online questionnaire. Mann-Whitney Results: There was a statistically significant difference in diagnostic scores between light microscopy and digital microscopy ( Conclusion: Although diagnostic scores were lower, digital microscopy was perceived as a useful method for enhancing diagnostic skills among dental students. Both light microscopy and digital microscopy are viable options for oral pathology practicals, however, digital microscopy was preferred by students due to its time efficiency and clear image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.