ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
The value of parotid sialography in the diagnosis and staging of Sjogren's syndrome.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound and shear wave elastography of the parotid glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) diagnostic criteria did not incorporate radiographic examination while staging SS according to salivary gland imaging and serological autoantibody tests was not discussed. The aim is to study the value of parotid sialography for diagnosing SS, and to initially explore the method of staging SS based on the results of imaging and serological autoantibody tests. Materials and methods: 287 patients' clinical records were included. The sensitivity and specificity of parotid sialography in the diagnosis of SS were investigated. SS patients were categorized into early stage (autoantibody positive, imaging does not support SS), active stage (autoantibody positive, imaging supports SS), and quiescent stage (autoantibody negative, imaging supports SS), clinical characteristics of different stages were compared. Results: The sensitivity of parotid sialography for the diagnosis of SS was 82.6%, the specificity was 71.5%. 10-minute USFR of the patients in the active stage (0.18 ± 0.38 ml/10min) was significantly lower than that of early stage (0.34 ± 0.47 ml/10min) and quiescent stage (0.54 ± 0.52 ml/10min), Conclusion: Parotid sialography remains valuable in the diagnosis of SS. Performing imaging and serological autoantibody tests before lip gland biopsy may reduce invasive examinations for patients without significantly increasing the rate of missed diagnosis. According to imaging and serological autoantibody tests, SS can be categorized into early, active, and quiescent stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.