ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
The
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet-derived biomaterials in osteoporosis: mechanisms, evidence and translational prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Pulp-Dentin Regeneration via Cell Homing: Current Evidence and Perspectives on Cell-Free Regenerative Endodontic Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Effects of A-PRFInternational journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Biomolecule-functionalized dental implant surfaces: Towards augmenting soft tissue integration.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Influence of Different Biomaterials Extracted from Autologous Blood on the Cell Migration of Stem Cells from Dental Pulp.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Platelet-rich fibrin promotes mesothelial cell proliferation and peritoneal repair by up-regulating calretinin to prevent postoperative intestinal adhesion.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The Effect of Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) on Graft Stability in Dental Implants and Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Procedures: A New Low-Speed Standardized Centrifugation Protocol.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a promising host-derived scaffold for regenerative endodontic treatment. This study investigated the effects of advanced PRF plus (A-PRF+) and injectable PRF (i-PRF) on the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of stem cells from apical papilla (SCAPs). Materials and methods: A-PRF+ and i-PRF were prepared using a DUO Quattro centrifuge following a standard protocol. A-PRF+ and i-PRF extract were diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's F-12 medium (DMEM/F12) to produce the experimental culture medium. DMEM/F12 and DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) were used as the negative control (NC) and positive control (PC) media, respectively. The proliferative ability of SCAPs was assessed using a counting method (haemocytometer). The migration ability was examined using a scratch-wound assay. Results: The proliferation, migration, and differentiation of SCAPs in the A-PRF+ group were similar to those of the PC group. In the i-PRF group, the cell number was significantly (p < 0.01) lower than that of the A-PRF+ group on days 8 and 10; the percentage of the scratched area on days 1 and 2 was significantly higher than in the A-PRF+ group (p < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of biomarkers in the i-PRF group were similar to those in the A-PRF+ group. Conclusion: Both A-PRF+ and i-PRF induce SCAPs proliferation, migration, and differentiation. However, A-PRF+ was superior in supporting the proliferation and migration of SCAPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.