ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Erythema multiforme: A retrospective study of etiologies, clinical manifestations, and treatments.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease: a case report and literature review in preschool-aged children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Treatment Strategies for Cutaneous and Oral Mucosal Side Effects of Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Lamotrigine Therapy: Relation Between Treatment of Bipolar Affective Disorder and Incidence of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome-A Narrative Review of the Existing Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Secondary syphilis mimicking erythema multiforme.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Erythema multiforme (EM) is considered a hypersensitivity reaction associated with drugs and infections, and remains underestimated due to the lack of precise classification and diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the triggering factors and clinical manifestations of EM and to present our experience in the diagnosis and management of this disorder. Materials and methods: All patient records were reviewed, and records of patients admitted, diagnosed, and treated with EM were retrieved. Data on age, gender, medical history, triggering factor(s), clinical form, mucosal/cutaneous involvement, affected oral site(s), recurrence, and treatment were collected. The data were analyzed statistically at a significance level set at Results: A total of 36 EM patients were studied. The triggering factor was identified as infection in 25 %, drugs in 16.7 %, infections and drugs in 41.7 %, and none in 16.7 % of the 36 EM patients. EM minor was diagnosed in 77.8 % of the patients. Labial mucosa (86.1 %) was the most commonly affected oral site. Most patients were treated with topical steroids (25 %). No significant differences were detected between demographic and clinical characteristics with regards to gender, triggering factor, and the number of affected oral sites ( Conclusion: The results of this study, based on the data from 36 EM patients with oral involvement treated at our clinic, can guide dentists in this regard and may be considered as an epidemiological source for the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.