Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347002›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Coagulation depth estimation using a line scanner for depth-resolved laser speckle contrast imaging.

Johannes D Johansson, Martin Hultman, Rolf Saager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes D JohanssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-0291
Martin HultmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Rolf SaagerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-1257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial-thickness burn wounds extend partially through the dermis, leaving many pain receptors intact and making the injuries very painful. Due to the painfulness, quick assessment of the burn depth is important to not delay surgery of the wound if needed. Laser speckle imaging (LSI) of skin blood flow can be helpful in finding severe coagulation zones with impaired blood flow. However, LSI measurements are typically too superficial to properly reach the full depth of the adult dermis and cannot resolve the flow in depth. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) uses varying source-detector separations to allow differentiation of flow depths but requires time-consuming 2D scanning to form an image of the burn area. We here present a prototype for a hybrid DCS and LSI technique called speckle contrast diffuse correlation spectroscopy (scDCS) with the novel approach of using a laser line as a source and using the speckle contrast of averaged images to obtain an estimate of static scattering in the tissue. This will allow for fast non-contact 1D scanning to perform 3D tomographic imaging, making quantitative estimates of the depth and area of the coagulation zone from burn wounds. Simulations and experimental results from a volumetric flow phantom and a gelatin wedge phantom show promise to determine coagulation depth. The aim is to develop a method that, in the future, could provide more quantitative estimates of coagulation depth in partial thickness burn wounds to better estimate when surgery is needed.

Identifiers

PMID39347002
PMCPMC11427187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.