ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Deep learning combined with attention mechanisms to assist radiologists in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis: a study on photoacoustic imaging.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning enhanced optical spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: A review.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- Vascular graph network for ovarian lesion classification using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Interpretable prediction of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer through integrated photoacoustic radiomics and clinical parameters.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography with learning-based classification enhances breast lesion characterization.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- From Innovation to Application: Can Emerging Imaging Techniques Transform Breast Cancer Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning and radiomics integration of photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging for non-invasive prediction of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer subtypes.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Advances in Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing image reconstruction in photoacoustic imaging using spatial coherence mean-to-standard-deviation factor beamforming.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of breast cancer (BC) is essential for effective treatment planning and improving patient outcomes. This study proposes a novel deep learning (DL) approach using photoacoustic (PA) imaging to enhance BC prediction accuracy. We enrolled 334 patients with breast lesions from Shenzhen People's Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Our method employs a ResNet50-based model combined with attention mechanisms to analyze photoacoustic ultrasound (PA-US) images. Experiments demonstrated that the PAUS-ResAM50 model achieved superior performance, with an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.884 -0.951), sensitivity of 0.750, accuracy of 0.854, and specificity of 0.920 in the training set. In the testing set, the model maintained high performance with an AUC of 0.870 (95% CI: 0.778-0.962), sensitivity of 0.786, specificity of 0.872, and accuracy of 0.836. Our model significantly outperformed other models, including PAUS-ResNet50, BMUS-ResAM50, and BMUS-ResNet50, as validated by the DeLong test (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Additionally, the PAUS-ResAM50 model improved radiologists' diagnostic specificity without reducing sensitivity, highlighting its potential for clinical application. In conclusion, the PAUS-ResAM50 model demonstrates substantial promise for optimizing BC diagnosis and aiding radiologists in early detection of BC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.