ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Adopting prospective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practice in high-risk immunosuppressed groups: an urgent call to action in the era of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Implementing portable, real-time 16S rRNA sequencing in the healthcare sector enhances antimicrobial stewardship.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship in Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review of Interventions, Outcomes, and Policy Implications.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of strategies to optimise antimicrobial use in solid organ transplant recipients. Systematic review and meta-analyses.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life-saving immunosuppressive treatments including intensive chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation expose patients to a considerable risk of death from infection globally. With evolving AMR and transmission, this could spell disaster for patients across the world and society at large. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and prompt appropriate management of potentially fatal, emergent infections are essential. It is now apparent that antibacterial prophylaxis in patients with haematological cancer may not provide survival benefit while simultaneously increasing risks for AMR carriage. With evolving AMR and increasing immunosuppressed populations across the world, we must institute robust AMS practices. Significant resources are used to combat the impact of AMR on immunosuppressed patients. For lower-middle income countries (LMICs) these resources may not be available and as such the impact caused by AMR is greater. By considering the patient journey holistically we consider risk of infection presented to patients temporally and geographically. A short-term and easy to implement approach of multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-style advance care planning for infection is advocated. Antimicrobials, when used appropriately, enable healthcare procedures to occur and exist. Indeed, the very future of clinical medicine will rely on this yet to be realized value of enablement. Proactive effort and change must occur across all sectors with holism; hence our impetus for convening a joint industry and clinical working group. With at-risk immunosuppressed groups being a sentinel for change, awareness and implementation of patient-centric actions for infection are essential and our recommendations serve as an urgent call to action.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.