Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346914›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma in China and the United States.

Guiyuan Xiang, Yueyue Huang, Lanlan Gan, Linning Wang, Yunqi Ding, Yuanlin Wu, Haiyan Xing, Yao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guiyuan XiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yueyue HuangDepartment of Operation Management, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lanlan GanDepartment of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Linning WangSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Yunqi DingDepartment of Oncology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuanlin WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haiyan XingDepartment of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yao LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Nivolumab, recently proven in a phase 3 clinical trial (CheckMate 901) to enhance survival when combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. This study aimed to assess its cost-effectiveness against gemcitabine-cisplatin alone, from US and Chinese payers' perspectives. Methods: A partitioned survival model was established to assess the life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin alone as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Univariate, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the model's robustness. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin achieved survival benefits of 4.238 life-years and 2.979 life-years for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, respectively. Compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin, nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in ICERs of $116,856/QALY in the US and $51,997/QALY in China. The probabilities of achieving cost-effectiveness at the current willingness-to-pay thresholds were 77.5% in the US and 16.5% in China. Cost-effectiveness could be reached if the price of nivolumab were reduced to $920.87/100mg in China. Subgroup analyses indicated that the combination had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness in patients under 65 or with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score of 0 in the US and China. Conclusion: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma results in longer life expectancy than gemcitabine-cisplatin, but is not cost-effective in China at current price. However, cost-effectiveness is likely to be achieved in most patient subgroups in the US.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCost-Benefit AnalysisDeoxycytidineGemcitabineNivolumabAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited StatesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineNivolumabchemotherapycisplatincost-effectivenessgemcitabinenivolumabpartitioned survival modelurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39346914
PMCPMC11427378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.