ReviewTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2024
Six Myths and Misconceptions about Essential Tremor.
Review in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between mild action tremor and cognition in community dwelling older adults: results from the KORA-Age study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Predictors of Incident Dementia in a Cohort of Elders with Essential Tremor: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2026Article
- An Investigation of Heterogeneity in Cerebellar Cortical Pathology Across Essential Tremor Cases: A Cluster Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Degenerative Changes in the Essential Tremor Cerebellum.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Continued Dialogue about the Clinical Heterogeneity and Degenerative Pathology That Characterizes the Essential Tremors.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Mortality in a Large Cohort of Elders with Essential Tremor.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Article
- Purkinje Cell Loss in Essential Tremor: Collective Data From 215 Brains Over a 21-Year Period.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Perceptual and Acoustical Features of Dysarthria in Essential Tremor: An Observational Study that Expands the Cerebellar Features of Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are myths and misperceptions about most human diseases, and neurological diseases are no exception. In many instances, myths and misconceptions reflect what is no more than the collective failure of the field to catch up with the state of the science in that field. Hence, one may perhaps refer to these as "lags" rather than myths. As the field of medicine attempts to be evidence-based, it is best to remain true to published data and the state of the science. In this paper, I review six myths and misconceptions about ET. Myth 1 relates to the natural history and prognosis of ET. Myths 2 and 3 relate to the biological basis of ET, whereas myths 4 and 5 relate to the expression of the core clinical feature of ET. Finally, myth 6 focuses on the issue of disease classification. The myths are as follows:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.