ArticleMolecular therapy. Oncology2024
Bulk and single-cell transcriptomics identify gene signatures of stem cell-derived NK cell donors with superior cytolytic activity.
Article in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-editing of NKG2A and FAS increases long-term cytotoxic capacity and persistence of CAR NK cells.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Automated cytotoxicity assessment of natural killer cells by flow cytometry.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities of human iPSC-derived NK as "Off-the-shelf" cellular therapies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
- Leveraging the heterogeneity of the NK cell repertoire for the development of immunotherapies for acute leukemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- In Vitro Expansion and Transduction of Primary NK Cells Using Feeder Cells Expressing Costimulatory Molecules and IL-21.Cancer science · 2025Article
- CD28 signaling domain boosts persistence andiScience · 2025Article
- Enhancing human NK cell antitumor function by knocking out SMAD4 to counteract TGFβ and activin A suppression.Nature immunology · 2025Article
- Umbilical cord blood natural killer cells for adoptive immunotherapy: identifying optimal starting material and processing parameters.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic natural killer (NK) cell therapies are a valuable treatment option for cancer, given their remarkable safety and favorable efficacy profile. Although the use of allogeneic donors allows for off-the-shelf and timely patient treatment, intrinsic interindividual differences put clinical efficacy at risk. The identification of donors with superior anti-tumor activity is essential to ensure the success of adoptive NK cell therapies. Here, we investigated the heterogeneity of 10 umbilical cord blood stem cell-derived NK cell batches. First, we evaluated the donors' cytotoxic potential against tumor cell lines from solid and hematological cancer indications, to distinguish a group of superior, "excellent" killers (4/10), compared with "good" killers (6/10). Next, bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, performed at different stages of NK differentiation, revealed distinct transcriptomic features of the two groups. Excellent donors showed an enrichment in cytotoxicity pathways and a depletion of myeloid traits, linked to the presence of a larger population of effector-like NK cells early on during differentiation. Consequently, we defined a multi-factorial gene expression signature able to predict the donors' cytotoxic potential. Our study contributes to the identification of key traits of superior NK cell batches, supporting the development of efficacious NK therapeutics and the achievement of durable anti-tumor responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.