Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346758›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2024

Protocol for the Implantation of Scaffolds in a Humanized Mouse Cutaneous Excisional Wound Healing Model.

Dina Gadalla, Maeve M Kennedy, David G Lott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dina GadallaHead and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Maeve M KennedyHead and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
David G LottHead and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

Optimizing a patient-specific regenerative larynx implant for restoration of voiceR01DC019114 · NIDCD · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI LOTT, DAVID G · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-engineered constructs combine the mechanical properties of biomaterials with biological agents to serve as scaffolds that direct the wound-healing process and promote tissue regeneration. A limitation to studying wound healing in vivo is that mouse skin contracts to heal rather than exhibiting granulation tissue formation and epithelialization like human skin. Therefore, it became necessary to develop a mouse model to better recapitulate human wound healing. The first splinted excisional wound healing model in mice, described in 2004, utilized silicone splints to prevent skin contracture.This model has been used to test a variety of wound healing strategies; however, to our knowledge, this model has not been adapted to test the effect of implants on wound healing. In our established protocol, circular bilateral excisional wounds are made on the mouse's dorsum. A circular implant made of porous polyethylene is sutured to the skin within the wound. A thin, donut-shaped silicone splint is secured to the skin surrounding the wound, and a thick, donut-shaped splint is placed on top to tent the wound dressing. Finally, the mouse's abdomen is wrapped in a bandage and tape toprotect the implants. Our protocol offers a significant enhancement to the existing model by enabling the testing of implants for wound healing, as well as using an additional splint that prevents direct contact between the wound dressing and the wound bed. This model can be used to study tissue-engineered implant designs in a relatively low-cost, simple, and high-throughput manner before advancing to larger animal studies. Key features • Builds up on methods developed by Galiano et al. [1] and extends their application to include scaffold testing. • Utilizes a construct that protects wounds, thereby enabling unaffected wound healing. • Can be adapted to test a wide variety of biomaterials for wound healing. • Describes dressing details and exact methodologies that prevent animals from interfering with wound healing.

Indexed as

DermalEpithelializationGranulation tissueMurineScaffold testingSplinted excisional modelWound healing

Identifiers

PMID39346758
PMCPMC11427238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.