ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
How we diagnose Myelodysplastic syndromes.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes: the classic and the novel.Haematologica · 2025Review
- Neutropenia (even mild) and anemia are poor prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal bone marrow (BM) stem cell myeloid neoplasms, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis that results in dysplasia in hematopoietic cells and peripheral cytopenias, especially anemia, and a propensity to leukemic transformation. The suspicion of MDS is raised by a typical but not specific clinical picture and routine laboratory findings, but the gold standard for MDS diagnosis is still BM examination with the presence of uni-or multi-lineage dysplasia and increased blast percentage, together with exclusion of other reasons. Cytogenetics is also an essential part of the diagnostic and prognostic processes. Flow cytometry and full genetic characterization are helpful but not mandatory for MDS diagnosis. This review summarizes the current steps of diagnostic approach for a patient suspected of having MDS. We also express our hopes that within the near future, non-invasive technologies, especially digital and peripheral blood genetics, will mature and be introduced into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.