ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Causal associations between constipation and pan-cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Observational studies have suggested a potential association between constipation and several cancers. However, the causal relationship between constipation and cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the potential causal relationship between constipation and pan-cancer using Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods. Methods: We performed a bidirectional MR analysis using publicly available summary data from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) statistics. The Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method was used as the main analysis method. We also used four MR methods: MR-Egger, Weighted Median, MR-PRESSO and MR.RAPS. Simultaneously, MR-Egger regression, Cochran's Q test and MR-PRESSO Global test were used to estimate the pleiotropy and heterogeneity of SNPs. In addition, we performed "leave-one-out" analyses" to avoid bias caused by horizontal pleiotropy of individual SNPs. Results: MR analysis revealed a potential causal association between constipation and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) [IVW (OR= 1.0021 (1.0003, 1.0039), P= 0.0234)], lung cancer (LC) [IVW (OR=1.0955 (1.0134, 1.1843), P=0.0218)], Oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OPC) [IVW (OR=1.4068 (1.0070, 1.9652), P=0.0454)], and Pancreatic cancer (PC) [IVW (OR=1.5580 (1.0659, 2.2773), P=0.0221)]. In addition, we explored causal relationships between constipation and 12 other types of cancers, including gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, skin melanoma and so on. All five methods yielded no evidence of a causal association between constipation and the risk of these cancer types. In the reverse MR analysis, there was no evidence of a causal association between cancer and the risk of constipation for all five methods. Conclusion: Our bidirectional MR study suggests a potential relationship between constipation and an increased risk of CRC, LC OPC and PC. The underlying mechanisms behind these associations will need to be explored in future experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.