Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346728›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Role of CT imaging in addressing resectability issues in differentiated thyroid cancer: imaging-based Mahajan grading system for TI and ETE.

Abhishek Mahajan, Shivam Rastogi, Shreya Shukla, Ujjwal Agarwal, Richa Vaish, Nivedita Chakrabarty, Renuka Ashtekar, Shonal Deokar, Atif Shaikh, Prathamesh Pai and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Abhishek MahajanImaging Department, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Shivam RastogiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Shreya ShuklaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Ujjwal AgarwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Richa VaishDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nivedita ChakrabartyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Renuka AshtekarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Shonal DeokarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Atif ShaikhDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Prathamesh PaiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Pankaj ChaturvediDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vasundhara SmritiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Swapnil U RaneDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Munita BalDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Asawari PatilDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Neha MittalDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vijay PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Anil K DcruzDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Extrathyroidal extension (ETE) is the term used to describe the growth of the primary thyroid tumor beyond the thyroid capsule. ETE is a critical prognostic marker for thyroid tumors, necessitating accurate preoperative assessment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT)-based grading for ETE and tracheal invasion (TI) for preoperative prediction in patients with differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and compare the diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound (US). Materials and methods: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. Preoperative US and CT were performed for 83 patients who underwent surgery for PTC between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. The US and CT features of ETE and TI of each case were retrospectively and independently investigated by two radiologists. The diagnostic performances of US and CT, including their specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for ETE, and their accuracy in predicting ETE and TI were analyzed. As per the grading for ETE on USG and CT, lesions were graded into three grades and Mahajan grading was also devised on CT to predict the TI and graded into four grades. Results: The accuracy and specificity of CT are relatively good for identifying tumor infiltration into the adjacent structures and range from 82% to 87% and 95% to 98%, respectively. It, however, has a low sensitivity, between 14.3% and 77.78%, when compared to US, which suggests that in case of any doubt regarding CT evidence of tumor infiltration into surrounding structures, additional clinical examination must be performed. CT showed better sensitivity (78%) and specificity (75%) in detecting TI compared to previous studies. The diagnostic accuracy of CT Mahajan grading was 91.5% with Conclusion: Preoperative US should be regarded as a first-line imaging modality for predicting minimal ETE, and CT should be additionally performed for the evaluation of maximal ETE. The specificity and PPV of CT are higher than those of US in detecting overall ETE and TI of PTC. The US- and CT-based grading systems have the potential to optimize preoperative surgical planning.

Indexed as

CTdiagnostic accuracydifferentiated papillary thyroid carcinomaextrathyroid extensionimagingthyroid cancertracheal invasionUS

Identifiers

PMID39346728
PMCPMC11427697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.