ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2024
Optimization of Automated Dimethylmethylene Blue Assay for Quantification of Pediatric Urine Samples.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metachromatic dye dimethylmethylene blue is used to quantify total glycosaminoglycans in urine. Understanding the interaction of dimethylmethylene blue with glycosaminoglycans is pertinent to optimize the assay procedure depending on the type of sample and interpret the findings meaningfully. The present spectrophotometric study determined the optimum sample-to-dye ratio, primary wavelength for measuring absorbance, after studying the interaction of two different chondroitin sulfate species (unfractionated chondroitin sulfate from bovine trachea vs. chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide with degree of polymerization of 12, from shark cartilage) with dimethylmethylene blue. Respective dye-glycosaminoglycan complexes of the two chondroitin sulfate species showed significantly different absorbance maxima, while that of the chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide was closer to absorbance maxima of urine glycosaminoglycans. The chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide showed relatively less stable absorbance readings at higher concentrations in the reaction volume. Furthermore, the chondroitin sulfate reference materials exhibited differences in the linearity of standard curves and hence parallelism. Based on the findings, the method was semiautomated on Beckman Coulter D✕C 700 biochemistry analyzer using the chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide as the standard. The urine glycosaminoglycan concentration obtained was slightly lower but reasonably close to that obtained through the External Quality Assurance (EQA) scheme administrated by ERNDIM (European Research Network, Inherited Disorders of Metabolism). The findings of the present study can be used to guide the dimethylmethylene blue assay optimization, redevelopment efforts, and harmonization across laboratories. The chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide is better than the unfractionated chondroitin sulfate from bovine trachea due to its absorbance maxima closer to urine glycosaminoglycans. On the other hand, unfractionated chondroitin sulfate exhibit poor parallelism leading to falsely lower urine glycosaminoglycan levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.