Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346698›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2024

Dose of phytase from either

Francisco Alves Pereira, Flavio Aguiar Coelho, Laya Kannan Silva Alves, Fernanda Mariane Dos Santos, Erick Marlon Pereira, Clarice Speridiao Silva Neta, Felipe Norberto Alves Ferreira, Ana Caroline Rodrigues da Cunha, Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia, Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francisco Alves PereiraDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Flavio Aguiar CoelhoDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Laya Kannan Silva AlvesDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-6121
Fernanda Mariane Dos SantosDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Erick Marlon PereiraDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3442-683X
Clarice Speridiao Silva NetaDepartment of Technical Services, Agroceres Multimix, Rio Claro-SP, 13502-741, Brazil.
Felipe Norberto Alves FerreiraDepartment of Technical Services, Agroceres Multimix, Rio Claro-SP, 13502-741, Brazil.
Ana Caroline Rodrigues da CunhaDepartment of Technical Services, Agroceres Multimix, Rio Claro-SP, 13502-741, Brazil.
Monique Danielle Pairis-GarciaDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Cesar Augusto Pospissil GarbossaDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga-SP, 13635-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplementing swine diets with phytase increases phosphorus release by approximately 50% from cereal phytates. The increase in phosphorus availability allows for a reduction in dietary phosphorus supplementation from mineral sources and decreases the environmental impact of pork production through a decrease in phosphorus excretion. Superdosing phytase has been reported to boost swine productivity, improve the digestibility of other nutrients, and mitigate the antinutritional effects of phytates. However, there are significant cost differences among phytase products. Bacterial phytases are considered more modern, often with a higher cost of inclusion. A study was conducted with 288 piglets that were 21 d of age and weighed 6.43 ± 0.956 kg. Pigs were divided into four groups. Each group of pigs was fed a different experimental diet varying in phytase source and level: fungal phytase (

Indexed as

bacterialfungalphosphorusphytasepigswine

Identifiers

PMID39346698
PMCPMC11439148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.