Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346625›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Confidence and second-order errors in cortical circuits.

Arno Granier, Mihai A Petrovici, Walter Senn, Katharina A Wilmes

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arno GranierDepartment of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, Bern 3012, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9259-1831
Mihai A PetroviciDepartment of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, Bern 3012, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-0427
Walter SennDepartment of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Katharina A WilmesDepartment of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, Bern 3012, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-1864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimization of cortical prediction errors has been considered a key computational goal of the cerebral cortex underlying perception, action, and learning. However, it is still unclear how the cortex should form and use information about uncertainty in this process. Here, we formally derive neural dynamics that minimize prediction errors under the assumption that cortical areas must not only predict the activity in other areas and sensory streams but also jointly project their confidence (inverse expected uncertainty) in their predictions. In the resulting neuronal dynamics, the integration of bottom-up and top-down cortical streams is dynamically modulated based on confidence in accordance with the Bayesian principle. Moreover, the theory predicts the existence of cortical second-order errors, comparing confidence and actual performance. These errors are propagated through the cortical hierarchy alongside classical prediction errors and are used to learn the weights of synapses responsible for formulating confidence. We propose a detailed mapping of the theory to cortical circuitry, discuss entailed functional interpretations, and provide potential directions for experimental work.

Indexed as

cortical computationenergy-based modelspredictive codinguncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39346625
PMCPMC11437657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.