ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2024
Tailor-Made Design of Three-Dimensional Batteries Using a Simple, Accurate Geometry Optimization Scheme.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving Internet of Things (IoT) society, the demand for microbatteries with high areal energy density is surging. As a promising strategy to enhance areal energy density, three-dimensional (3D) batteries have attracted attention. The feature of 3D batteries is the decoupling of the electrode thickness from the ion-transport distance through the modification of the spatial arrangement of the positive and negative electrodes beyond the conventional parallel plates configuration. This allows for the accommodation of a larger amount of active materials without increasing internal resistance. However, identifying the optimal 3D geometry is a complex task, as it depends on printable materials, the resolution of the fabrication equipment, as well as battery usage, which constitutes a multiobjective optimization problem. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel approach to determine the optimal 3D microbattery geometry. Our innovative method involves a 3D battery optimization system, which integrates an automatic geometry generator with a quick and accurate performance simulator. This approach allows, for the first time, the discovery of material- and discharge-current-dependent optimal geometries. We successfully apply this optimization scheme to two standard electrode pairs (LiFePO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.