Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

A stakeholder perspective on the necessary conditions for successfully implementing parenting interventions in Botswana.

Hlengiwe Gwebu, Tendai Elvis Mutembedza, Jacqueline Kilby, Jeldau Rieff, Styn Jamu, Lisa Jamu, Nomsa Monare, Mary Mosenke, Mmannyana Margaret Nonong, Babedi Ncaagae and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hlengiwe GwebuDepartment of Public Health, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
Tendai Elvis MutembedzaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jacqueline KilbyDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeldau RieffStepping Stones International, Gaborone, Botswana.
Styn JamuStepping Stones International, Gaborone, Botswana.
Lisa JamuStepping Stones International, Gaborone, Botswana.
Nomsa MonareStepping Stones International, Gaborone, Botswana.
Mary MosenkeMinistry of Local Government and Rural Development, Department of Social Development, Family Welfare Services Division, Gaborone, Botswana.
Mmannyana Margaret NonongMinistry of Local Government and Rural Development, Department of Social Development, Family Welfare Services Division, Gaborone, Botswana.
Babedi NcaagaeMinistry of Local Government and Rural Development, Department of Social Development, Family Welfare Services Division, Gaborone, Botswana.
Yulia ShenderovichWolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jamie LachmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lucie CluverCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Catherine L WardDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Encouraging positive parenting practices through evidence-based interventions is vital for the achievement of SDG target 16.2, which aims to eradicate all forms of violence against children while promoting their safety and mental wellbeing. As low- and middle- income countries increasingly adopt parenting programs, policymakers and implementers face the challenge of efficiently transporting, adapting, and implementing them across multiple settings. Purpose: This study seeks to evaluate the real-world experiences, challenges, and best practices in implementing parent support programs in Botswana. Method: A series of interviews with program implementers and stakeholders from governmental and non-governmental organizations were conducted. Key informants from governmental and non-governmental institutions were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling and 17 practitioners participated in the study. Data collection was carried out through online Zoom video conferencing at a convenient time and location for participants. Findings: The findings indicate several factors that contribute to the successful implementation of parenting programs in Botswana, including (a) enabling factors such as supportive policies, regulations and guidelines, (b) innovative factors such as capacity building, program adaptation and mixed method program delivery, (c) bridging factors through collaborations with skilled organizations, and (d) intra-organizational factors such as organizational resources, program sustainability, and support for program staff. Conclusion: No single organization or strategy can sustainably foster positive parenting support in Botswana. Instead, a collective and collaborative learning approach is necessary to develop lasting and scalable solutions.

Indexed as

ParentingBotswanaCapacity BuildingChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleParentsStakeholder ParticipationBotswanaparent-child relationshipsparenting interventionsparent support programsstakeholder perspectivesviolence prevention

Identifiers

PMID39346590
PMCPMC11436346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.