Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346581›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Exploring public opinion on health effects of prepared dishes in China through social media comments.

Tao Shu, Han Yang, Ling Lin, Jian Chen, Jixian Zhou, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao ShuSchool of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China.
Han YangSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China.
Ling LinSchool of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Jian ChenSchool of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China.
Jixian ZhouSchool of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Jun WangSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the 2020s, particularly following 2022, the Chinese government introduced a series of initiatives to foster the development of the prepared dishes sector, accompanied by substantial investments from industrial capital. Consequently, China's prepared dishes industry has experienced rapid growth. Nevertheless, this swift expansion has elicited varied public opinions, particularly concerning the potential health effects of prepared dishes. Therefore, this study aims to gather and analyze comments from social media on prepared dishes using machine learning techniques. The objective is to ascertain the perspectives of the Chinese populace on the health implications of consuming prepared dishes. Methods: Social media comments, characterized by their broad distribution, objectivity, and timeliness, served as the primary data source for this study. Initially, the data underwent preprocessing to ensure its suitability for analysis. Subsequent steps in this study involved conducting sentiment analysis and employing the BERTopic model for topic clustering. These methods aimed to identify the principal concerns of the public regarding the impact of prepared dishes on health. The final phase of the study involved a comparative analysis of changes in public sentiment and thematic focus across different time frames. This approach provides a dynamic view of evolving public perceptions related to the health implications of prepared dishes. Results: This study analyzed over 600,000 comments gathered from various social media platforms from mid-July 2022 to the end of March 2024. Following data preprocessing, 200,993 comments were assessed for sentiment, revealing that more than 64% exhibited negative emotions. Subsequent topic clustering using the BERTopic model identified that 11 of the top 50 topics were related to public health concerns. These topics primarily scrutinized the safety of prepared dish production processes, raw materials, packaging materials, and additives. Moreover, significant public's interest was in the right to informed consumption across different contexts. Notably, the most pronounced public opposition emerged regarding introducing prepared dishes into primary and secondary school canteens, with criticisms directed at the negligence of educational authorities and the ethics of manufacturers. Additionally, there were strong recommendations for media organizations to play a more active role in monitoring public opinion and for government agencies to enhance regulatory oversight. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that more than half of the Chinese public maintain a negative perception towards prepared dishes, particularly concerning about health implications. Chinese individuals display considerable sensitivity and intense reactions to news and events related to prepared dishes. Consequently, the study recommends that manufacturers directly address public psychological perceptions, proactively enhance production processes and service quality, and increase transparency in public communications to improve corporate image and people acceptance of prepared dishes. Additionally, supervisory and regulatory efforts must be intensified by media organizations and governmental bodies, fostering the healthy development of the prepared food industry in China.

Indexed as

Public OpinionSocial MediaChinaHumansprepared dishespublic opinionsentiment analysissocial media commentstopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID39346581
PMCPMC11427877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.