ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Incidence and Pattern of Mandibular Impacted 3
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacted third molars and their influence on second molar pathologies: radiological patterns, statistical analysis, and emerging AI perspectives.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Impacted mandibular third molars pose challenges in dental practice, often requiring surgical intervention. This retrospective study aims to analyze the demographics, impaction patterns, and anatomical relationships of impacted mandibular third molars among Saudi patients. Methodology: Data from 722 patients visiting the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences at Jizan University were retrospectively analyzed. Parameters including gender distribution, impaction types, relationship with the mandibular canal, and age demographics were evaluated based on panoramic radiographs. Results: Bilateral impaction predominated (57.59%), with mesioangular impaction being the most common (46.51%). Gender differences were noted in impaction types and relationships with the mandibular canal. Interruption of white lines of the canal was more frequent in males (70.00%). Early adulthood (20-25 years) exhibited the highest prevalence of impaction. Conclusion: The study provides insights into the demographics and characteristics of impacted mandibular third molars among Saudi patients. Gender-specific variations and age distribution underscore the importance of tailored treatment approaches and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.