ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Long-Term Outcomes of Conservative versus Surgical Management of Dental Caries.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramic Overlays and Full-Coverage Crowns for Maxillary Premolars.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of dental caries presents challenges for oral health professionals, with options including conservative and surgical interventions. However, debate persists regarding the long-term efficacy of these strategies. Methods: This retrospective cohort research involved 500 subjects diagnosed with dental caries at the University Dental Clinic between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Data on demographics, dental history, treatments, and follow-up were collected from patient records. Subjects were categorized into conservative and surgical groups based on treatment received. Outcome measures included tooth survival, caries recurrence, and patient satisfaction. Results: The research included 300 subjects, with 60% under conservative management and 40% under surgical management. Demographics were comparable between groups, and both groups showed similar outcomes in tooth survival, caries recurrence, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in these outcomes between groups. Conclusion: Conservative and surgical management approaches demonstrate comparable long-term outcomes in treating dental caries, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions. Further research with larger samples and prospective designs is needed to validate these findings and guide evidence-based practice in dental caries management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.