Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346414›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Asha A Hegde, P M Roveena, Rashme Rashme, Ushma Hardik Prajapati, Rajashekar Reddy Vundela, Avantika Vijaysingh Jadhav

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asha A HegdeOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Kurunjibhag, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
P M RoveenaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Government Dental College, Pariyaram, Kannur, Kerala, India.
Rashme RashmeDentist, Walmart Health Center, Florida, US.
Ushma Hardik PrajapatiDepartment of Dental and Implant Surgery, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Shree Krishna Hospital, Anand - Sojitra Rd, Gokul Nagar, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Rajashekar Reddy VundelaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
Avantika Vijaysingh JadhavProsthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic therapy aims at achieving stable treatment outcomes by ensuring retention of corrected tooth positions. Various retention protocols have been proposed, but their efficacy in sustaining treatment outcomes remains unclear. Materials and Methods: This Results: The mean amount of mesial movement observed in group A was 0.5 mm (SD ± 0.1), in group B was 0.7 mm (SD ± 0.2), and in group C was 0.3 mm (SD ± 0.1). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in retention efficacy among the three groups ( Conclusion: The bonded retainer demonstrated superior efficacy in sustaining treatment outcomes by minimizing post-orthodontic tooth movement compared to Essix and Hawley retainers. Thus, the bonded retainer may be considered a preferable option for retention following orthodontic therapy.

Indexed as

Bonded retainerEssix retainerHawley retainerorthodonticsretention protocolstreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39346414
PMCPMC11426569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.