Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346334›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Enhancing Airway Management: A Comparative Study of Macintosh and TAS Scope in Difficult Intubations.

Sanjana Kota Venkatalakshmana, R Kaaviya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjana Kota VenkatalakshmanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Saveetha Medical College Hospital Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
R KaaviyaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Saveetha Medical College Hospital Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intubation is essential in anesthesia for patient safety, requiring accurate techniques for difficult airways. Achieving first-attempt success is crucial. This study evaluates traditional laryngoscopes, such as the Macintosh, versus advanced tools like the TAS Scope. Material and Methods: This observational study, conducted from April to August 2023 at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, involved 60 patients aged 18-65. The two groups of Macintosh laryngoscope and TAS Scope 30 each are based on airway difficulty predictors and patient characteristics. Results: The TAS Scope group had a higher first-attempt success rate and easier intubation experiences according to Likert scale ratings. Conclusion: The study underscores the benefits of using advanced devices like the TAS Scope for difficult airway management, showing higher success rates and ease of use. These findings support the adoption of new technologies to enhance patient safety and intubation effectiveness.

Indexed as

Difficult airwaysfirst-attempt successintubationmacintosh laryngoscopeTAS scope

Identifiers

PMID39346334
PMCPMC11426699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.