Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346306›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Nayan J Sahu, Pratyaksha S Panwar, Nupur R Dhanak, P V Samir, Ajmal Najeeb, Deepa Rayast

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nayan J SahuDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pratyaksha S PanwarDepartment of Dentistry, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Nupur R DhanakDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, GDCH, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
P V SamirDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ajmal NajeebDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Amrita School of Dentistry, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Deepa RayastDepartment of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into three groups of ten. Each group was treated with one of the sealants - Embrace WetBond, Helioseal Clear, or Fuji VII. Following cleaning and preparation, the sealants were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Teeth were then sectioned and prepared for SEM investigation, and the length of resin tags was measured. Results: Scanning electron microscopy revealed Embrace WetBond produced significantly longer resin tags than Helioseal Clear and Fuji VII. Conclusion: The study concludes that Embrace WetBond sealant exhibited the longest resin tags, which may suggest a stronger mechanical bond to enamel.

Indexed as

Embrace WetBondHelioseal Clearpit and fissure sealants

Identifiers

PMID39346306
PMCPMC11426811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.