ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Mandibular Asymmetry in TMJ Ankylosis Patients.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis frequently results in mandibular asymmetry, which impairs an affected person's ability to function and look good. Because of the intricacy of TMJ ankylosis and the variety of surgical procedures available, correcting mandibular asymmetry surgically can be difficult. Methods: Patients with mandibular asymmetry and TMJ ankylosis who had surgery at a tertiary care facility between certain periods were the subject of a retrospective investigation. Medical records were used to gather information on patient demographics, pre-operative imaging, surgical methods, and post-operative results. Surgical methods included condylectomy with or without reconstruction, joint reconstruction with or without orthognathic surgery, and unilateral or bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). Occlusion, patient-reported results, and facial symmetry made up the evaluation criteria. Findings: The study had a total of 50 patients, with different surgical method distributions. Comparing unilateral and bilateral MDO to condylectomy and joint reconstruction, notable gains in face symmetry and occlusion were seen. The largest complication rate was seen with condylectomy, mostly from recurrence and device-related issues, albeit the rates of other procedures varied as well. Conclusion: In conclusion, customized treatment planning is necessary for the correction of mandibular asymmetry in individuals with TMJ ankylosis. Although mandibular distraction osteogenesis produces better results for occlusion and facial symmetry, it is crucial to carefully weigh the risks involved. While still feasible treatments, condylectomy and joint reconstruction require strict monitoring for any consequences. In order to enhance patient care in this difficult patient group, future research should concentrate on improving treatment procedures and long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.